Page 1 of 1

So, I been thinkin....

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 7:43 am
by dragracer1951
I've been thinking about it and realized that I tend
to find that to a certain extent; the more bikes I
have the less I tend to ride. Over the years I have
found that having just one solid reliable bike makes
for the most consistent riding. That's why the best
thing is to just have one bike. And it should be a
large solid stable highway capable / comfortable one
I feel.

For the street I mean, because a bike for the dirt is
always good to have too. Of course; it's more fun
riding in the woods with somebody so what I do is to
keep two dirt bikes in case whoever is available doesn't
have one or didn't bring it over with them. Three is
actually better; in case they show up with someone.

And I like to have a bike for sort trips too.
Something lighter, and more maneuverable than a heavy
cruiser; easy to park on sidewalks when it's crowded
and so forth.

Well, and it's always good to have something small for
just buzzing around the neighborhood - running up to
the hardware store for a few screws or a saw blade, or
going to the post office, or around the corner for coffee.

Something else that comes in Really handy is a scooter -
with the foot boards and leg shields it's great if the
rain has just stopped or the roads are slushy in the early
or late winter. And a lot of times women will ride a
scooter where they would not be enticed to ride a
motorcycle. So if you have two scooters your wife and her
girlfriends can go riding together.

And since I do all the work on the bike, it's good to have
a parts bike for it. Well for each of them I guess would
really be the best thing.

So anyway; that's why it's best to just have one bike.
. . uhhhh . . . well; not just one, but certainly very
few . . . Just cut it to the bare necessities is what I am
trying to say. No sense in having too many - it's just
counter-productive in general.

And you can see; that is what makes me the superior
motorcyclist - realizing that fact. And that is why I only
have, let me see here . . . oh . . ahhh . . . three, four,
and those three make eight, and then there's . . . ahhhhh . . . thirty three.

Uhhhh . . . well never mind about that - the important
thing is to keep it so a minimum. So it's 'manageable'

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 12:57 pm
by noshoes
You are wise the 1 they call "Drag-racer"........But as Morphous said in the Matrix.. "There is a difference between knowing the path and walking the path."
Image
:poke :poke :poke :funny :funny :funny

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 1:23 pm
by kiwi60
Gidday

I fully agree with your reasoning - one bike to do everything, funny thing is - when I was young (along time ago) in the 70's, I tend to recall that one bike could actually do everything!!!!

I have great memories of my Suzuki T500 - indestructible engine, long wheel base resulting in stable handling, great for commuting touring, a bit of scratching around the hills - and being able to handle some excellent trail riding and a few jumps as well...oh to be young stupid and broke again...nah I'll stick with middle aged and semi responsible - it's much more fun.

Come to think of it - I did some quite long tours on my 2 stroke 125 trail bike as well.

I guess that each of the bikes I had at the time seemed powerful to a young rider and capable of taking on the world (do you remember your first ride on a bike and how a 50cc motor was almost uncontrolably powerful...)

Just as well I'm going racing today, I'm starting to sound rather old and sad here.

Cheers

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 6:14 pm
by hotcam
The dilemma of us all. What we really want is a "transformers" bike, luggage and comfy passenger seat for 1000miles, then when we reach the mountains press the button and *whirr clank clank* it's a sportbike, then into town it's a streetfighter...

of course some of that technology is already available! Have you seen Mission Impossible (I forget whether it was 1 or 2) where the Triumphs are fitted with tyres that automatically retract or extend knobs depending on whether the bike is on dirt?... :poke

I'm tempted for my next bike to be an FZ1, which is as close as I can get to being a comfy touring bike and a lightweight sports bike at the same time. Of course there's one other thing, I'd like it to cost $10,000 less then I can afford one :help donations gratefully accepted :poke :roll

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 7:24 pm
by willi
hmmm,s having more than one bike meanz? less riding. probably due to the fact, that your always thinking about wich one you want to ride. :poke

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 8:58 pm
by RUFtech
I think you need to invite the brotherhood over and let EVERYONE ride!!!!

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:50 am
by orionburn
RUFtech wrote:I think you need to invite the brotherhood over and let EVERYONE ride!!!!
And the sad thing is that there would probably still be bikes leftover that wouldn't get ridden....

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:19 am
by dragracer1951
Well, there may be many but they're all loved....