jjs777 wrote:silver wrote:Photography (real photography...none of that digital crap) YESSIREE !!!! Ain't using my inkjet's for anything permanant in my home ! If it's not silver-based then it had better be platinum ! And the bigger the negative the better, IMO.
how big ?
5X7 is my preferred format.
I'm using a crown graphic 4x5, a rollei tlr 120, and a mamiya rb67. I just sold the mamiya super23 to my buddy. Still use the 35mm for fun. The rb67 is great...and to think they still make it after 30 years? that says something
I currently own a 5X7 Linhof Tech III, a 5X7 Kodak Century View, 4X5 Zone VI, a 4X5 Speed Graphic, the RB67SD, a Mamiya C220, a baby Speed Graphic 23 and few Nikons. Need any enlargers ? I have 6 !
Still a kodachrome advocate. Heck how many digital cams did they make songs out of? Shelf life for kr14 is 120 years for the least stable colour of yellow. Otherwise 180 years.
I shoot only B-&-W now. Otherwise it's digital for snappies which are mostly for the web. I still use Ilford Gallerie graded FB and hand print all images. You should see a 5X7 negative enlarged just 2X to 10X14 !
I've inherited all this equipment from my dad.
Hopefully he left you some great images as well. One of the reasons I got into photography was that my father passed when I was young and we have just one photograph of him.
I'm no professional but generally get good results.
After being an amateur for 17 years and working as assistants for anyone that needed me, I opened a studio in New Jersey. Unfortunately it was bad timing as all of the yung people in our area were moving out and within 7 years that local average age had nearly doubled. Hate to say it but older people don't like photographs of themselves. Also they generally don't like B-&-W which will always be my "first love". Anyway, we had to take a serious look at the whole area and we found that we didn't want to live there anymore anyway so we relocated to Tennessee. Of course there was the whole Digital Debacle
(TM) to deal with as well.
digitals ok for throw away pics
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
Digital is the near-perfect replacement for Polaroid although it can never replace 55 P/N which produced some of the best looking negatives I've ever seen. Tack sharp and remarkably fine grained for something developed in hydroxide. Remember the small scanners that you could install in a 5.25" bay to scan Polaroid ? That was one of Polaroids last best-efforts.